Cuba vs Serbia: FAO projections of arable land, per unit of GDP
Cuba
0 hectares per US$ of GDP
in 2020
Serbia
0 hectares per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Cuba rank
85th
Serbia rank
83rd
FAO projections of arable land, per unit of GDP over time
- Cuba
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 0 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in Cuba, a difference of 0 hectares per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Serbia ahead.
Cuba ranks 85th and Serbia ranks 83rd of 205 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | Cuba |
| 2010s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | Serbia |
| 2020s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fao projections of arable land, per unit of gdp, Cuba or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 0 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in Cuba as of 2023.
- What is the difference in fao projections of arable land, per unit of gdp between Cuba and Serbia?
- 0 hectares per US$ of GDP, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Serbia?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2020.
- How do Cuba and Serbia rank globally for fao projections of arable land, per unit of gdp?
- Cuba ranks 85th and Serbia ranks 83rd of 205 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as FAO projections of arable land, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
FAO projections of arable land divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.