Barbados vs Guam: FAO projections of arable land, per unit of GDP
Barbados
0 hectares per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Guam
0 hectares per US$ of GDP
in 2022
Barbados rank
175th
Guam rank
172nd
FAO projections of arable land, per unit of GDP over time
- Barbados
- Guam
How they compare
Guam currently reports 0 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in Barbados, a difference of 0 hectares per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Barbados ahead.
Barbados ranks 175th and Guam ranks 172nd of 205 countries.
Barbados has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | Guam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | Barbados |
| 2010s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | Barbados |
| 2020s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | Barbados |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fao projections of arable land, per unit of gdp, Barbados or Guam?
- Guam, at 0 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in Barbados as of 2022.
- What is the difference in fao projections of arable land, per unit of gdp between Barbados and Guam?
- 0 hectares per US$ of GDP, with Guam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Guam?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2022.
- How do Barbados and Guam rank globally for fao projections of arable land, per unit of gdp?
- Barbados ranks 175th and Guam ranks 172nd of 205 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as FAO projections of arable land, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
FAO projections of arable land divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.