Mozambique vs Trinidad and Tobago: FAO projections of arable land, per square kilometre

Mozambique
7.69 hectares per square kilometre
in 2023
Trinidad and Tobago
9.16 hectares per square kilometre
in 2023
Mozambique rank
134th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
131st

FAO projections of arable land, per square kilometre over time

  • Mozambique
  • Trinidad and Tobago
5101520196119922023

How they compare

Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 9.16 hectares per square kilometre against 7.69 hectares per square kilometre in Mozambique, a difference of 1.47 hectares per square kilometre.

That makes Trinidad and Tobago's figure about 1.2 times Mozambique's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Trinidad and Tobago has been ahead every year.

Mozambique ranks 134th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 131st of 208 countries.

Trinidad and Tobago has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mozambique Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1960s 3.46 hectares per square kilometre 17.93 hectares per square kilometre 14.47 hectares per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1970s 3.9 hectares per square kilometre 19.32 hectares per square kilometre 15.41 hectares per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1980s 4.27 hectares per square kilometre 14.21 hectares per square kilometre 9.94 hectares per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1990s 4.98 hectares per square kilometre 13.57 hectares per square kilometre 8.59 hectares per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2000s 6.35 hectares per square kilometre 9.79 hectares per square kilometre 3.43 hectares per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2010s 7.63 hectares per square kilometre 9.16 hectares per square kilometre 1.53 hectares per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2020s 7.68 hectares per square kilometre 9.16 hectares per square kilometre 1.48 hectares per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fao projections of arable land, per square kilometre, Mozambique or Trinidad and Tobago?
Trinidad and Tobago, at 9.16 hectares per square kilometre against 7.69 hectares per square kilometre in Mozambique as of 2023.
What is the difference in fao projections of arable land, per square kilometre between Mozambique and Trinidad and Tobago?
1.47 hectares per square kilometre, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and Trinidad and Tobago?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Mozambique and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for fao projections of arable land, per square kilometre?
Mozambique ranks 134th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 131st of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as FAO projections of arable land, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mozambique vs Trinidad and Tobago: FAO projections of arable land, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/fao-projections-of-arable-land-per-square-kilometre/mozambique/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/fao-projections-of-arable-land-per-square-kilometre/mozambique/trinidad-and-tobago/">Mozambique vs Trinidad and Tobago: FAO projections of arable land, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
FAO projections of arable land, per square kilometre
Unit
hectares per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
208 places, 11,997 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

FAO projections of arable land divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.