Morocco vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: FAO projections of arable land, per square kilometre

Morocco
19.69 hectares per square kilometre
in 2023
Saint Kitts and Nevis
19.62 hectares per square kilometre
in 2023
Morocco rank
74th
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
75th

FAO projections of arable land, per square kilometre over time

  • Morocco
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
20304050196119922023

How they compare

Morocco currently reports 19.69 hectares per square kilometre against 19.62 hectares per square kilometre in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0.07 hectares per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.

Morocco ranks 74th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 75th of 208 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Morocco averaged higher in 1 and Saint Kitts and Nevis in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Morocco Saint Kitts and Nevis Difference Ahead
1960s 16.15 hectares per square kilometre 45.08 hectares per square kilometre 28.93 hectares per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
1970s 17.33 hectares per square kilometre 40 hectares per square kilometre 22.67 hectares per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
1980s 19.1 hectares per square kilometre 46.92 hectares per square kilometre 27.83 hectares per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
1990s 21.88 hectares per square kilometre 32.69 hectares per square kilometre 10.81 hectares per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
2000s 20.64 hectares per square kilometre 21.7 hectares per square kilometre 1.07 hectares per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
2010s 20.9 hectares per square kilometre 19.42 hectares per square kilometre 1.48 hectares per square kilometre Morocco
2020s 19.6 hectares per square kilometre 19.62 hectares per square kilometre 0.0165 hectares per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fao projections of arable land, per square kilometre, Morocco or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
Morocco, at 19.69 hectares per square kilometre against 19.62 hectares per square kilometre in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2023.
What is the difference in fao projections of arable land, per square kilometre between Morocco and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
0.07 hectares per square kilometre, with Morocco ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Morocco and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Morocco and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for fao projections of arable land, per square kilometre?
Morocco ranks 74th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 75th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as FAO projections of arable land, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Morocco vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: FAO projections of arable land, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/fao-projections-of-arable-land-per-square-kilometre/morocco/st-kitts-and-nevis/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/fao-projections-of-arable-land-per-square-kilometre/morocco/st-kitts-and-nevis/">Morocco vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: FAO projections of arable land, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
FAO projections of arable land, per square kilometre
Unit
hectares per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
208 places, 11,997 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

FAO projections of arable land divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.