Mauritania vs New Caledonia: FAO projections of arable land, per square kilometre

Mauritania
0.4463 hectares per square kilometre
in 2023
New Caledonia
0.5306 hectares per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritania rank
203rd
New Caledonia rank
201st

FAO projections of arable land, per square kilometre over time

  • Mauritania
  • New Caledonia
0.20.40.60.81196119922023

How they compare

New Caledonia currently reports 0.5306 hectares per square kilometre against 0.4463 hectares per square kilometre in Mauritania, a difference of 0.0843 hectares per square kilometre.

That makes New Caledonia's figure about 1.2 times Mauritania's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, New Caledonia has been ahead every year.

Mauritania ranks 203rd and New Caledonia ranks 201st of 208 countries.

New Caledonia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritania New Caledonia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.2657 hectares per square kilometre 0.6504 hectares per square kilometre 0.3846 hectares per square kilometre New Caledonia
1970s 0.2124 hectares per square kilometre 0.7768 hectares per square kilometre 0.5644 hectares per square kilometre New Caledonia
1980s 0.2897 hectares per square kilometre 0.8807 hectares per square kilometre 0.591 hectares per square kilometre New Caledonia
1990s 0.4317 hectares per square kilometre 0.733 hectares per square kilometre 0.3013 hectares per square kilometre New Caledonia
2000s 0.4463 hectares per square kilometre 0.5842 hectares per square kilometre 0.1379 hectares per square kilometre New Caledonia
2010s 0.4463 hectares per square kilometre 0.5394 hectares per square kilometre 0.0931 hectares per square kilometre New Caledonia
2020s 0.4463 hectares per square kilometre 0.5306 hectares per square kilometre 0.0843 hectares per square kilometre New Caledonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fao projections of arable land, per square kilometre, Mauritania or New Caledonia?
New Caledonia, at 0.5306 hectares per square kilometre against 0.4463 hectares per square kilometre in Mauritania as of 2023.
What is the difference in fao projections of arable land, per square kilometre between Mauritania and New Caledonia?
0.0843 hectares per square kilometre, with New Caledonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and New Caledonia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Mauritania and New Caledonia rank globally for fao projections of arable land, per square kilometre?
Mauritania ranks 203rd and New Caledonia ranks 201st of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as FAO projections of arable land, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritania vs New Caledonia: FAO projections of arable land, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/fao-projections-of-arable-land-per-square-kilometre/mauritania/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/fao-projections-of-arable-land-per-square-kilometre/mauritania/new-caledonia/">Mauritania vs New Caledonia: FAO projections of arable land, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
FAO projections of arable land, per square kilometre
Unit
hectares per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
208 places, 11,997 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

FAO projections of arable land divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.