Israel vs Tanzania: FAO projections of arable land, per square kilometre

Israel
17.22 hectares per square kilometre
in 2023
Tanzania
17.52 hectares per square kilometre
in 2023
Israel rank
83rd
Tanzania rank
81st

FAO projections of arable land, per square kilometre over time

  • Israel
  • Tanzania
5101520196119922023

How they compare

Tanzania currently reports 17.52 hectares per square kilometre against 17.22 hectares per square kilometre in Israel, a difference of 0.3 hectares per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Israel ahead.

Israel ranks 83rd and Tanzania ranks 81st of 208 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Israel averaged higher in 6 and Tanzania in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Israel Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s 18.71 hectares per square kilometre 7.65 hectares per square kilometre 11.05 hectares per square kilometre Israel
1970s 19.19 hectares per square kilometre 9.26 hectares per square kilometre 9.93 hectares per square kilometre Israel
1980s 19.45 hectares per square kilometre 10.72 hectares per square kilometre 8.72 hectares per square kilometre Israel
1990s 19.71 hectares per square kilometre 11.23 hectares per square kilometre 8.48 hectares per square kilometre Israel
2000s 18.38 hectares per square kilometre 12.77 hectares per square kilometre 5.61 hectares per square kilometre Israel
2010s 19.14 hectares per square kilometre 16.2 hectares per square kilometre 2.94 hectares per square kilometre Israel
2020s 17.27 hectares per square kilometre 17.52 hectares per square kilometre 0.2498 hectares per square kilometre Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fao projections of arable land, per square kilometre, Israel or Tanzania?
Tanzania, at 17.52 hectares per square kilometre against 17.22 hectares per square kilometre in Israel as of 2023.
What is the difference in fao projections of arable land, per square kilometre between Israel and Tanzania?
0.3 hectares per square kilometre, with Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Tanzania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Israel and Tanzania rank globally for fao projections of arable land, per square kilometre?
Israel ranks 83rd and Tanzania ranks 81st of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as FAO projections of arable land, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Israel vs Tanzania: FAO projections of arable land, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/fao-projections-of-arable-land-per-square-kilometre/israel/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/fao-projections-of-arable-land-per-square-kilometre/israel/tanzania/">Israel vs Tanzania: FAO projections of arable land, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
FAO projections of arable land, per square kilometre
Unit
hectares per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
208 places, 11,997 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

FAO projections of arable land divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.