Guinea-Bissau vs North Korea: FAO projections of arable land, per square kilometre

Guinea-Bissau
22.96 hectares per square kilometre
in 2023
North Korea
21.14 hectares per square kilometre
in 2023
Guinea-Bissau rank
66th
North Korea rank
69th

FAO projections of arable land, per square kilometre over time

  • Guinea-Bissau
  • North Korea
0510152025196119922023

How they compare

Guinea-Bissau currently reports 22.96 hectares per square kilometre against 21.14 hectares per square kilometre in North Korea, a difference of 1.82 hectares per square kilometre.

That makes Guinea-Bissau's figure about 1.1 times North Korea's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was North Korea ahead.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 66th and North Korea ranks 69th of 208 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Guinea-Bissau averaged higher in 1 and North Korea in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea-Bissau North Korea Difference Ahead
1960s 10 hectares per square kilometre 18.08 hectares per square kilometre 8.08 hectares per square kilometre North Korea
1970s 10.49 hectares per square kilometre 18.67 hectares per square kilometre 8.18 hectares per square kilometre North Korea
1980s 11.87 hectares per square kilometre 20.17 hectares per square kilometre 8.3 hectares per square kilometre North Korea
1990s 14.67 hectares per square kilometre 20.7 hectares per square kilometre 6.03 hectares per square kilometre North Korea
2000s 18.94 hectares per square kilometre 20.99 hectares per square kilometre 2.05 hectares per square kilometre North Korea
2010s 20.01 hectares per square kilometre 21.36 hectares per square kilometre 1.35 hectares per square kilometre North Korea
2020s 22.7 hectares per square kilometre 21.14 hectares per square kilometre 1.55 hectares per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fao projections of arable land, per square kilometre, Guinea-Bissau or North Korea?
Guinea-Bissau, at 22.96 hectares per square kilometre against 21.14 hectares per square kilometre in North Korea as of 2023.
What is the difference in fao projections of arable land, per square kilometre between Guinea-Bissau and North Korea?
1.82 hectares per square kilometre, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and North Korea?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Guinea-Bissau and North Korea rank globally for fao projections of arable land, per square kilometre?
Guinea-Bissau ranks 66th and North Korea ranks 69th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as FAO projections of arable land, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea-Bissau vs North Korea: FAO projections of arable land, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/fao-projections-of-arable-land-per-square-kilometre/guinea-bissau/korea-dem-people-s-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/fao-projections-of-arable-land-per-square-kilometre/guinea-bissau/korea-dem-people-s-rep/">Guinea-Bissau vs North Korea: FAO projections of arable land, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
FAO projections of arable land, per square kilometre
Unit
hectares per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
208 places, 11,997 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

FAO projections of arable land divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.