Equatorial Guinea vs Jordan: FAO projections of arable land, per square kilometre

Equatorial Guinea
3.56 hectares per square kilometre
in 2023
Jordan
3.24 hectares per square kilometre
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea rank
169th
Jordan rank
172nd

FAO projections of arable land, per square kilometre over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Jordan
0246196119922023

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 3.56 hectares per square kilometre against 3.24 hectares per square kilometre in Jordan, a difference of 0.32 hectares per square kilometre.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Jordan's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 169th and Jordan ranks 172nd of 208 countries.

Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Jordan Difference Ahead
1960s 4.91 hectares per square kilometre 3.43 hectares per square kilometre 1.49 hectares per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
1970s 4.4 hectares per square kilometre 3.67 hectares per square kilometre 0.7322 hectares per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
1980s 3.86 hectares per square kilometre 3.81 hectares per square kilometre 0.0448 hectares per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
1990s 3.59 hectares per square kilometre 3.15 hectares per square kilometre 0.4369 hectares per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2000s 3.57 hectares per square kilometre 3.04 hectares per square kilometre 0.5289 hectares per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2010s 3.57 hectares per square kilometre 3.31 hectares per square kilometre 0.2559 hectares per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2020s 3.56 hectares per square kilometre 3.25 hectares per square kilometre 0.309 hectares per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fao projections of arable land, per square kilometre, Equatorial Guinea or Jordan?
Equatorial Guinea, at 3.56 hectares per square kilometre against 3.24 hectares per square kilometre in Jordan as of 2023.
What is the difference in fao projections of arable land, per square kilometre between Equatorial Guinea and Jordan?
0.32 hectares per square kilometre, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Jordan?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Jordan rank globally for fao projections of arable land, per square kilometre?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 169th and Jordan ranks 172nd of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as FAO projections of arable land, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Jordan: FAO projections of arable land, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/fao-projections-of-arable-land-per-square-kilometre/equatorial-guinea/jordan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/fao-projections-of-arable-land-per-square-kilometre/equatorial-guinea/jordan/">Equatorial Guinea vs Jordan: FAO projections of arable land, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
FAO projections of arable land, per square kilometre
Unit
hectares per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
208 places, 11,997 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

FAO projections of arable land divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.