Ecuador vs Trinidad and Tobago: FAO projections of arable land, per square kilometre

Ecuador
9.7 hectares per square kilometre
in 2023
Trinidad and Tobago
9.16 hectares per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
129th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
131st

FAO projections of arable land, per square kilometre over time

  • Ecuador
  • Trinidad and Tobago
05101520196119922023

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 9.7 hectares per square kilometre against 9.16 hectares per square kilometre in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 0.54 hectares per square kilometre.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Trinidad and Tobago's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Trinidad and Tobago ahead.

Ecuador ranks 129th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 131st of 208 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 3 and Trinidad and Tobago in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1960s 9.13 hectares per square kilometre 17.93 hectares per square kilometre 8.81 hectares per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1970s 9.23 hectares per square kilometre 19.32 hectares per square kilometre 10.09 hectares per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1980s 9.69 hectares per square kilometre 14.21 hectares per square kilometre 4.52 hectares per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1990s 11.06 hectares per square kilometre 13.57 hectares per square kilometre 2.51 hectares per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2000s 10.39 hectares per square kilometre 9.79 hectares per square kilometre 0.606 hectares per square kilometre Ecuador
2010s 10.03 hectares per square kilometre 9.16 hectares per square kilometre 0.8668 hectares per square kilometre Ecuador
2020s 9.74 hectares per square kilometre 9.16 hectares per square kilometre 0.5801 hectares per square kilometre Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fao projections of arable land, per square kilometre, Ecuador or Trinidad and Tobago?
Ecuador, at 9.7 hectares per square kilometre against 9.16 hectares per square kilometre in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2023.
What is the difference in fao projections of arable land, per square kilometre between Ecuador and Trinidad and Tobago?
0.54 hectares per square kilometre, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Trinidad and Tobago?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for fao projections of arable land, per square kilometre?
Ecuador ranks 129th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 131st of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as FAO projections of arable land, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Trinidad and Tobago: FAO projections of arable land, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/fao-projections-of-arable-land-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/fao-projections-of-arable-land-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/trinidad-and-tobago/">Ecuador vs Trinidad and Tobago: FAO projections of arable land, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
FAO projections of arable land, per square kilometre
Unit
hectares per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
208 places, 11,997 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

FAO projections of arable land divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.