Democratic Republic of Congo vs Puerto Rico: FAO projections of arable land, per square kilometre

Democratic Republic of Congo
7.45 hectares per square kilometre
in 2023
Puerto Rico
7.46 hectares per square kilometre
in 2023
Democratic Republic of Congo rank
140th
Puerto Rico rank
139th

FAO projections of arable land, per square kilometre over time

  • Democratic Republic of Congo
  • Puerto Rico
0102030196119922023

How they compare

Puerto Rico currently reports 7.46 hectares per square kilometre against 7.45 hectares per square kilometre in Democratic Republic of Congo, a difference of 0.01 hectares per square kilometre.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Puerto Rico has been ahead every year.

Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 140th and Puerto Rico ranks 139th of 208 countries.

Puerto Rico has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Democratic Republic of Congo Puerto Rico Difference Ahead
1960s 3.11 hectares per square kilometre 30.73 hectares per square kilometre 27.61 hectares per square kilometre Puerto Rico
1970s 3.28 hectares per square kilometre 19.52 hectares per square kilometre 16.24 hectares per square kilometre Puerto Rico
1980s 3.42 hectares per square kilometre 14.62 hectares per square kilometre 11.2 hectares per square kilometre Puerto Rico
1990s 3.42 hectares per square kilometre 10.19 hectares per square kilometre 6.77 hectares per square kilometre Puerto Rico
2000s 3.35 hectares per square kilometre 10.22 hectares per square kilometre 6.88 hectares per square kilometre Puerto Rico
2010s 6.02 hectares per square kilometre 8.52 hectares per square kilometre 2.5 hectares per square kilometre Puerto Rico
2020s 7.14 hectares per square kilometre 7.46 hectares per square kilometre 0.3232 hectares per square kilometre Puerto Rico

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fao projections of arable land, per square kilometre, Democratic Republic of Congo or Puerto Rico?
Puerto Rico, at 7.46 hectares per square kilometre against 7.45 hectares per square kilometre in Democratic Republic of Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in fao projections of arable land, per square kilometre between Democratic Republic of Congo and Puerto Rico?
0.01 hectares per square kilometre, with Puerto Rico ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of Congo and Puerto Rico?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Democratic Republic of Congo and Puerto Rico rank globally for fao projections of arable land, per square kilometre?
Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 140th and Puerto Rico ranks 139th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as FAO projections of arable land, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Democratic Republic of Congo vs Puerto Rico: FAO projections of arable land, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/fao-projections-of-arable-land-per-square-kilometre/congo-dem-rep/puerto-rico-us/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/fao-projections-of-arable-land-per-square-kilometre/congo-dem-rep/puerto-rico-us/">Democratic Republic of Congo vs Puerto Rico: FAO projections of arable land, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
FAO projections of arable land, per square kilometre
Unit
hectares per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
208 places, 11,997 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

FAO projections of arable land divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.