Bahamas vs Turks and Caicos Islands: FAO projections of arable land, per square kilometre

Bahamas
1.1 hectares per square kilometre
in 2023
Turks and Caicos Islands
1.05 hectares per square kilometre
in 2023
Bahamas rank
193rd
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
195th

FAO projections of arable land, per square kilometre over time

  • Bahamas
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
00.250.50.751196119922023

How they compare

Bahamas currently reports 1.1 hectares per square kilometre against 1.05 hectares per square kilometre in Turks and Caicos Islands, a difference of 0.05 hectares per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.

Bahamas ranks 193rd and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 195th of 208 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Bahamas averaged higher in 2 and Turks and Caicos Islands in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bahamas Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
1960s 0.8991 hectares per square kilometre 1.05 hectares per square kilometre 0.1535 hectares per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands
1970s 0.8991 hectares per square kilometre 1.05 hectares per square kilometre 0.1535 hectares per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands
1980s 0.8991 hectares per square kilometre 1.05 hectares per square kilometre 0.1535 hectares per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands
1990s 0.8392 hectares per square kilometre 1.05 hectares per square kilometre 0.2135 hectares per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands
2000s 0.8991 hectares per square kilometre 1.05 hectares per square kilometre 0.1535 hectares per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands
2010s 1.09 hectares per square kilometre 1.05 hectares per square kilometre 0.0363 hectares per square kilometre Bahamas
2020s 1.1 hectares per square kilometre 1.05 hectares per square kilometre 0.0463 hectares per square kilometre Bahamas

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fao projections of arable land, per square kilometre, Bahamas or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Bahamas, at 1.1 hectares per square kilometre against 1.05 hectares per square kilometre in Turks and Caicos Islands as of 2023.
What is the difference in fao projections of arable land, per square kilometre between Bahamas and Turks and Caicos Islands?
0.05 hectares per square kilometre, with Bahamas ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Turks and Caicos Islands?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Bahamas and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for fao projections of arable land, per square kilometre?
Bahamas ranks 193rd and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 195th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as FAO projections of arable land, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bahamas vs Turks and Caicos Islands: FAO projections of arable land, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/fao-projections-of-arable-land-per-square-kilometre/bahamas-the/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/fao-projections-of-arable-land-per-square-kilometre/bahamas-the/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Bahamas vs Turks and Caicos Islands: FAO projections of arable land, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
FAO projections of arable land, per square kilometre
Unit
hectares per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
208 places, 11,997 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

FAO projections of arable land divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.