Kiribati vs Zimbabwe: FAO projections of arable land, per capita

Kiribati
0.2565 hectares per person
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.2489 hectares per person
in 2023
Kiribati rank
55th
Zimbabwe rank
57th

FAO projections of arable land, per capita over time

  • Kiribati
  • Zimbabwe
0.20.40.60.8196119922023

How they compare

Kiribati currently reports 0.2565 hectares per person against 0.2489 hectares per person in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.0076 hectares per person.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Kiribati ahead.

Kiribati ranks 55th and Zimbabwe ranks 57th of 208 countries.

Kiribati has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kiribati Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.7679 hectares per person 0.2582 hectares per person 0.5096 hectares per person Kiribati
1970s 0.6336 hectares per person 0.2895 hectares per person 0.3441 hectares per person Kiribati
1980s 0.5823 hectares per person 0.2937 hectares per person 0.2886 hectares per person Kiribati
1990s 0.4596 hectares per person 0.2897 hectares per person 0.1699 hectares per person Kiribati
2000s 0.3509 hectares per person 0.3151 hectares per person 0.0358 hectares per person Kiribati
2010s 0.293 hectares per person 0.2866 hectares per person 0.0064 hectares per person Kiribati
2020s 0.2629 hectares per person 0.2556 hectares per person 0.0073 hectares per person Kiribati

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fao projections of arable land, per capita, Kiribati or Zimbabwe?
Kiribati, at 0.2565 hectares per person against 0.2489 hectares per person in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in fao projections of arable land, per capita between Kiribati and Zimbabwe?
0.0076 hectares per person, with Kiribati ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Kiribati and Zimbabwe rank globally for fao projections of arable land, per capita?
Kiribati ranks 55th and Zimbabwe ranks 57th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as FAO projections of arable land, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kiribati vs Zimbabwe: FAO projections of arable land, per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/fao-projections-of-arable-land-per-capita/kiribati/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/fao-projections-of-arable-land-per-capita/kiribati/zimbabwe/">Kiribati vs Zimbabwe: FAO projections of arable land, per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
FAO projections of arable land, per capita
Unit
hectares per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
208 places, 11,968 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

FAO projections of arable land divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.