Ghana vs South Sudan: FAO projections of arable land, per capita
Ghana
0.2195 hectares per person
in 2023
South Sudan
0.2242 hectares per person
in 2023
Ghana rank
70th
South Sudan rank
68th
FAO projections of arable land, per capita over time
- Ghana
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 0.2242 hectares per person against 0.2195 hectares per person in Ghana, a difference of 0.0047 hectares per person.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was South Sudan ahead.
Ghana ranks 70th and South Sudan ranks 68th of 208 countries.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ghana | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.2416 hectares per person | 0.2419 hectares per person | 0.0003 hectares per person | South Sudan |
| 2020s | 0.226 hectares per person | 0.2272 hectares per person | 0.0012 hectares per person | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fao projections of arable land, per capita, Ghana or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 0.2242 hectares per person against 0.2195 hectares per person in Ghana as of 2023.
- What is the difference in fao projections of arable land, per capita between Ghana and South Sudan?
- 0.0047 hectares per person, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ghana and South Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Ghana and South Sudan rank globally for fao projections of arable land, per capita?
- Ghana ranks 70th and South Sudan ranks 68th of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as FAO projections of arable land, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
FAO projections of arable land divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.