El Salvador vs Sudan: FAO projections of arable land, annual growth rate
El Salvador
0 % change on previous year
in 2023
Sudan
0 % change on previous year
in 2023
El Salvador rank
70th
Sudan rank
70th
FAO projections of arable land, annual growth rate over time
- El Salvador
- Sudan
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 0 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in Sudan, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2013 it was El Salvador ahead.
El Salvador ranks 70th and Sudan ranks 70th of 224 countries.
Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.114 % change on previous year | 0.8374 % change on previous year | 0.7234 % change on previous year | Sudan |
| 2020s | 0 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fao projections of arable land, annual growth rate, El Salvador or Sudan?
- El Salvador, at 0 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in Sudan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in fao projections of arable land, annual growth rate between El Salvador and Sudan?
- 0 % change on previous year, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Sudan?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2023.
- How do El Salvador and Sudan rank globally for fao projections of arable land, annual growth rate?
- El Salvador ranks 70th and Sudan ranks 70th of 224 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as FAO projections of arable land, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in FAO projections of arable land. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.