Costa Rica vs Sudan: FAO projections of arable land, annual growth rate
Costa Rica
0 % change on previous year
in 2023
Sudan
0 % change on previous year
in 2023
Costa Rica rank
70th
Sudan rank
70th
FAO projections of arable land, annual growth rate over time
- Costa Rica
- Sudan
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 0 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in Sudan, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 70th and Sudan ranks 70th of 224 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 1 and Sudan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | -0.2103 % change on previous year | 0.8374 % change on previous year | 1.05 % change on previous year | Sudan |
| 2020s | 0.2596 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 0.2596 % change on previous year | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fao projections of arable land, annual growth rate, Costa Rica or Sudan?
- Costa Rica, at 0 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in Sudan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in fao projections of arable land, annual growth rate between Costa Rica and Sudan?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Sudan?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2023.
- How do Costa Rica and Sudan rank globally for fao projections of arable land, annual growth rate?
- Costa Rica ranks 70th and Sudan ranks 70th of 224 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as FAO projections of arable land, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in FAO projections of arable land. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.