Rwanda vs South Africa: Excessive working hours, more than 48 hours per week, aged 15-64
Rwanda
0.2%
in 2021
South Africa
0.2%
in 2020
Rwanda rank
44th
South Africa rank
41st
Excessive working hours, more than 48 hours per week, aged 15-64 over time
- Rwanda
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 0.2% against 0.2% in Rwanda, a difference of 0.0%.
That makes South Africa's figure about 1.1 times Rwanda's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Rwanda ahead.
Rwanda ranks 44th and South Africa ranks 41st of 84 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Rwanda averaged higher in 2 and South Africa in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Rwanda | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.6% | 0.3% | 0.2% | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.0% | South Africa |
| 2020s | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.0% | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher excessive working hours, more than 48 hours per week, aged 15-64, Rwanda or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 0.2% against 0.2% in Rwanda as of 2020.
- What is the difference in excessive working hours, more than 48 hours per week, aged 15-64 between Rwanda and South Africa?
- 0.0%, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and South Africa?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
- How do Rwanda and South Africa rank globally for excessive working hours, more than 48 hours per week, aged 15-64?
- Rwanda ranks 44th and South Africa ranks 41st of 84 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Excessive working hours, more than 48 hours per week, aged 15-64, total (% of total employed population in working age). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.