South Africa vs Sri Lanka: Excessive working hours, more than 48 hours per week, aged 15-64
South Africa
0.2%
in 2020
Sri Lanka
0.2%
in 2015
South Africa rank
37th
Sri Lanka rank
36th
Excessive working hours, more than 48 hours per week, aged 15-64 over time
- South Africa
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 0.2% against 0.2% in South Africa, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 1995 it was South Africa ahead.
South Africa ranks 37th and Sri Lanka ranks 36th of 81 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Africa | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.3% | 0.2% | 0.0% | South Africa |
| 2000s | 0.4% | 0.2% | 0.1% | South Africa |
| 2010s | 0.3% | 0.2% | 0.0% | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher excessive working hours, more than 48 hours per week, aged 15-64, South Africa or Sri Lanka?
- Sri Lanka, at 0.2% against 0.2% in South Africa as of 2015.
- What is the difference in excessive working hours, more than 48 hours per week, aged 15-64 between South Africa and Sri Lanka?
- 0.0%, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Africa and Sri Lanka?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2015.
- How do South Africa and Sri Lanka rank globally for excessive working hours, more than 48 hours per week, aged 15-64?
- South Africa ranks 37th and Sri Lanka ranks 36th of 81 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Excessive working hours, more than 48 hours per week, aged 15-64, primary education and below (% of employed population with low education in working age). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.