Equatorial Guinea vs Viet Nam: Equality of Political Power across Social Groups Score
Equatorial Guinea
-1.64
in 2025
Viet Nam
-1.55
in 2025
Equatorial Guinea rank
165th
Viet Nam rank
163rd
Equality of Political Power across Social Groups Score over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Viet Nam currently reports -1.55 against -1.64 in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.09.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 50 shared years of data; in 1976 it was Viet Nam ahead.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 165th and Viet Nam ranks 163rd of 176 countries.
Viet Nam has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | -1.07 | -0.346 | 0.721 | Viet Nam |
| 1980s | -1.49 | -0.346 | 1.15 | Viet Nam |
| 1990s | -1.49 | -0.346 | 1.15 | Viet Nam |
| 2000s | -1.49 | -0.346 | 1.15 | Viet Nam |
| 2010s | -1.46 | -0.4474 | 1.01 | Viet Nam |
| 2020s | -1.47 | -1.43 | 0.0388 | Viet Nam |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher equality of political power across social groups score, Equatorial Guinea or Viet Nam?
- Viet Nam, at -1.55 against -1.64 in Equatorial Guinea as of 2025.
- What is the difference in equality of political power across social groups score between Equatorial Guinea and Viet Nam?
- 0.09, with Viet Nam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Viet Nam?
- 50 years are reported by both, from 1976 to 2025.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Viet Nam rank globally for equality of political power across social groups score?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 165th and Viet Nam ranks 163rd of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Equality of Political Power across Social Groups Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which social groups — defined by language, ethnicity, religion, race, region, and/or caste — are irrelevant to politics or have similar political power.