Libya vs Philippines: Equal Resource Distribution Index
Libya
0.257
in 2025
Philippines
0.24
in 2025
Libya rank
145th
Philippines rank
148th
Equal Resource Distribution Index over time
- Libya
- Philippines
How they compare
Libya currently reports 0.257 against 0.24 in Philippines, a difference of 0.017.
That makes Libya's figure about 1.1 times Philippines's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 83 shared years of data; in 1934 it was Philippines ahead.
Libya ranks 145th and Philippines ranks 148th of 175 countries.
Across the 10 decades both report, Libya averaged higher in 8 and Philippines in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1930s | 0.035 | 0.202 | 0.167 | Philippines |
| 1940s | 0.0335 | 0.212 | 0.1785 | Philippines |
| 1950s | 0.455 | 0.2284 | 0.2266 | Libya |
| 1960s | 0.4529 | 0.2421 | 0.2108 | Libya |
| 1970s | 0.557 | 0.2683 | 0.2887 | Libya |
| 1980s | 0.557 | 0.291 | 0.266 | Libya |
| 1990s | 0.557 | 0.3158 | 0.2412 | Libya |
| 2000s | 0.557 | 0.314 | 0.243 | Libya |
| 2010s | 0.413 | 0.3087 | 0.1043 | Libya |
| 2020s | 0.2662 | 0.2448 | 0.0213 | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher equal resource distribution index, Libya or Philippines?
- Libya, at 0.257 against 0.24 in Philippines as of 2025.
- What is the difference in equal resource distribution index between Libya and Philippines?
- 0.017, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Philippines?
- 83 years are reported by both, from 1934 to 2025.
- How do Libya and Philippines rank globally for equal resource distribution index?
- Libya ranks 145th and Philippines ranks 148th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Equal Resource Distribution Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which all social groups benefit from public spending and have equal access to education, healthcare, and the welfare state.