Malta vs Namibia: Engaged Society Score
Malta
0.937
in 2025
Namibia
0.867
in 2025
Malta rank
81st
Namibia rank
83rd
Engaged Society Score over time
- Malta
- Namibia
How they compare
Malta currently reports 0.937 against 0.867 in Namibia, a difference of 0.07.
That makes Malta's figure about 1.1 times Namibia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 126 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Malta ahead.
Malta ranks 81st and Namibia ranks 83rd of 176 countries.
Across the 13 decades both report, Malta averaged higher in 9 and Namibia in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malta | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0.515 | -2 | 2.51 | Malta |
| 1910s | 0.515 | -2 | 2.51 | Malta |
| 1920s | 0.515 | -1.86 | 2.37 | Malta |
| 1930s | 0.515 | -1.72 | 2.24 | Malta |
| 1940s | 0.515 | -1.72 | 2.24 | Malta |
| 1950s | 0.515 | -1.72 | 2.24 | Malta |
| 1960s | 0.6446 | -1.72 | 2.37 | Malta |
| 1970s | 0.731 | -1.58 | 2.31 | Malta |
| 1980s | 0.7865 | -0.9012 | 1.69 | Malta |
| 1990s | 1.05 | 1.18 | 0.124 | Namibia |
| 2000s | 1.05 | 1.18 | 0.124 | Namibia |
| 2010s | 0.9721 | 1.24 | 0.2642 | Namibia |
| 2020s | 0.937 | 0.9625 | 0.0255 | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher engaged society score, Malta or Namibia?
- Malta, at 0.937 against 0.867 in Namibia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in engaged society score between Malta and Namibia?
- 0.07, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Namibia?
- 126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Malta and Namibia rank globally for engaged society score?
- Malta ranks 81st and Namibia ranks 83rd of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Engaged Society Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which ordinary people independently discuss important policy changes among themselves, in the media, in associations or neighborhoods, or in the streets.