Finland vs Mongolia: Engaged Society Score
Finland
1.94
in 2025
Mongolia
2
in 2025
Finland rank
31st
Mongolia rank
28th
Engaged Society Score over time
- Finland
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 2 against 1.94 in Finland, a difference of 0.06.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 115 shared years of data; in 1911 it was Finland ahead.
Finland ranks 31st and Mongolia ranks 28th of 176 countries.
Across the 12 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 11 and Mongolia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 0.1868 | -1.16 | 1.35 | Finland |
| 1920s | 1.04 | -0.7496 | 1.79 | Finland |
| 1930s | 0.4157 | -0.7946 | 1.21 | Finland |
| 1940s | 0.5708 | -0.708 | 1.28 | Finland |
| 1950s | 1.77 | -0.708 | 2.47 | Finland |
| 1960s | 1.85 | -0.593 | 2.45 | Finland |
| 1970s | 1.89 | -0.593 | 2.48 | Finland |
| 1980s | 2.42 | -0.593 | 3.01 | Finland |
| 1990s | 2.99 | 2.03 | 0.956 | Finland |
| 2000s | 2.97 | 2.58 | 0.3839 | Finland |
| 2010s | 2.45 | 2.48 | 0.0279 | Mongolia |
| 2020s | 2.14 | 1.53 | 0.6102 | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher engaged society score, Finland or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at 2 against 1.94 in Finland as of 2025.
- What is the difference in engaged society score between Finland and Mongolia?
- 0.06, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Mongolia?
- 115 years are reported by both, from 1911 to 2025.
- How do Finland and Mongolia rank globally for engaged society score?
- Finland ranks 31st and Mongolia ranks 28th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Engaged Society Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which ordinary people independently discuss important policy changes among themselves, in the media, in associations or neighborhoods, or in the streets.