Eswatini vs Hong Kong: Engaged Society Score
Eswatini
-0.762
in 2025
Hong Kong
-0.675
in 2025
Eswatini rank
151st
Hong Kong rank
148th
Engaged Society Score over time
- Eswatini
- Hong Kong
How they compare
Hong Kong currently reports -0.675 against -0.762 in Eswatini, a difference of 0.087.
Across all 126 years both countries report, Hong Kong has been ahead every year.
Eswatini ranks 151st and Hong Kong ranks 148th of 176 countries.
Hong Kong has averaged higher in every one of the 13 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Hong Kong | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | -2.68 | -1.09 | 1.59 | Hong Kong |
| 1910s | -2.34 | -1.09 | 1.25 | Hong Kong |
| 1920s | -2.34 | -1.09 | 1.25 | Hong Kong |
| 1930s | -2.34 | -1.09 | 1.25 | Hong Kong |
| 1940s | -2.34 | -1.14 | 1.2 | Hong Kong |
| 1950s | -2.34 | -0.6545 | 1.69 | Hong Kong |
| 1960s | -1.71 | -0.602 | 1.1 | Hong Kong |
| 1970s | -1.46 | -0.0374 | 1.42 | Hong Kong |
| 1980s | -1.77 | 1.01 | 2.78 | Hong Kong |
| 1990s | -1.47 | 1.29 | 2.75 | Hong Kong |
| 2000s | -1.02 | 1.58 | 2.6 | Hong Kong |
| 2010s | -0.681 | 1.44 | 2.12 | Hong Kong |
| 2020s | -0.8482 | -0.6063 | 0.2418 | Hong Kong |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher engaged society score, Eswatini or Hong Kong?
- Hong Kong, at -0.675 against -0.762 in Eswatini as of 2025.
- What is the difference in engaged society score between Eswatini and Hong Kong?
- 0.087, with Hong Kong ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Hong Kong?
- 126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Eswatini and Hong Kong rank globally for engaged society score?
- Eswatini ranks 151st and Hong Kong ranks 148th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Engaged Society Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which ordinary people independently discuss important policy changes among themselves, in the media, in associations or neighborhoods, or in the streets.