Eritrea vs Russia: Engaged Society Score
Eritrea
-1.49
in 2025
Russia
-1.86
in 2025
Eritrea rank
165th
Russia rank
168th
Engaged Society Score over time
- Eritrea
- Russia
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports -1.49 against -1.86 in Russia, a difference of 0.37.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 126 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Russia ahead.
Eritrea ranks 165th and Russia ranks 168th of 176 countries.
Across the 13 decades both report, Eritrea averaged higher in 2 and Russia in 11.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Russia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | -2.03 | -1.21 | 0.8276 | Russia |
| 1910s | -2.03 | -0.617 | 1.42 | Russia |
| 1920s | -2.03 | -0.6158 | 1.42 | Russia |
| 1930s | -2.03 | -1.83 | 0.2021 | Russia |
| 1940s | 0.063 | -2.24 | 2.31 | Eritrea |
| 1950s | -0.341 | -0.8881 | 0.5471 | Eritrea |
| 1960s | -0.9011 | -0.1424 | 0.7587 | Russia |
| 1970s | -2.06 | -0.433 | 1.63 | Russia |
| 1980s | -2.73 | 0.1587 | 2.89 | Russia |
| 1990s | -0.7904 | 1.47 | 2.26 | Russia |
| 2000s | -1.15 | 0.5981 | 1.75 | Russia |
| 2010s | -1.48 | 0.5479 | 2.02 | Russia |
| 2020s | -1.46 | -0.7202 | 0.7403 | Russia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher engaged society score, Eritrea or Russia?
- Eritrea, at -1.49 against -1.86 in Russia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in engaged society score between Eritrea and Russia?
- 0.37, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Russia?
- 126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Eritrea and Russia rank globally for engaged society score?
- Eritrea ranks 165th and Russia ranks 168th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Engaged Society Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which ordinary people independently discuss important policy changes among themselves, in the media, in associations or neighborhoods, or in the streets.