Congo vs Malaysia: Engaged Society Score
Congo
0.561
in 2025
Malaysia
0.55
in 2025
Congo rank
101st
Malaysia rank
104th
Engaged Society Score over time
- Congo
- Malaysia
How they compare
Congo currently reports 0.561 against 0.55 in Malaysia, a difference of 0.011.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 123 shared years of data; in 1903 it was Malaysia ahead.
Congo ranks 101st and Malaysia ranks 104th of 176 countries.
Across the 13 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 4 and Malaysia in 9.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | -2.64 | -0.99 | 1.65 | Malaysia |
| 1910s | -2.64 | -0.99 | 1.65 | Malaysia |
| 1920s | -2.64 | -0.99 | 1.65 | Malaysia |
| 1930s | -2.64 | -0.99 | 1.65 | Malaysia |
| 1940s | -2.2 | -1.04 | 1.16 | Malaysia |
| 1950s | -1.62 | -0.3931 | 1.22 | Malaysia |
| 1960s | 0.4619 | -0.15 | 0.6119 | Congo |
| 1970s | -0.693 | -0.406 | 0.287 | Malaysia |
| 1980s | -0.693 | -0.556 | 0.137 | Malaysia |
| 1990s | 0.5809 | -0.468 | 1.05 | Congo |
| 2000s | -0.079 | 0.0018 | 0.0808 | Malaysia |
| 2010s | 0.2403 | 0.2081 | 0.0322 | Congo |
| 2020s | 0.561 | 0.3243 | 0.2367 | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher engaged society score, Congo or Malaysia?
- Congo, at 0.561 against 0.55 in Malaysia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in engaged society score between Congo and Malaysia?
- 0.011, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Malaysia?
- 123 years are reported by both, from 1903 to 2025.
- How do Congo and Malaysia rank globally for engaged society score?
- Congo ranks 101st and Malaysia ranks 104th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Engaged Society Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which ordinary people independently discuss important policy changes among themselves, in the media, in associations or neighborhoods, or in the streets.