Niger vs Peru: Enforcing contracts: Trial and judgment

Niger
200 days
in 2019
Peru
223 days
in 2019
Niger rank
161st
Peru rank
159th

Enforcing contracts: Trial and judgment over time

  • Niger
  • Peru
0100200300400201120152019

How they compare

Peru currently reports 223 days against 200 days in Niger, a difference of 23 days.

That makes Peru's figure about 1.1 times Niger's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Niger ahead.

Niger ranks 161st and Peru ranks 159th of 188 countries.

Niger has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: trial and judgment, Niger or Peru?
Peru, at 223 days against 200 days in Niger as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: trial and judgment between Niger and Peru?
23 days, with Peru ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Niger and Peru?
9 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2019.
How do Niger and Peru rank globally for enforcing contracts: trial and judgment?
Niger ranks 161st and Peru ranks 159th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Trial and judgment (days). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Trial and judgment (days)
Unit
days
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,702 data points, 2011–2019
Last refreshed

The time for trial and judgment captures the time from the moment defendant is served until the time to appeal has elapsed.