Mongolia vs New Zealand: Enforcing contracts: Trial and judgment
Mongolia
180 days
in 2019
New Zealand
167 days
in 2019
Mongolia rank
168th
New Zealand rank
170th
Enforcing contracts: Trial and judgment over time
- Mongolia
- New Zealand
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 180 days against 167 days in New Zealand, a difference of 13 days.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.1 times New Zealand's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2011 it was New Zealand ahead.
Mongolia ranks 168th and New Zealand ranks 170th of 188 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: trial and judgment, Mongolia or New Zealand?
- Mongolia, at 180 days against 167 days in New Zealand as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: trial and judgment between Mongolia and New Zealand?
- 13 days, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and New Zealand?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2019.
- How do Mongolia and New Zealand rank globally for enforcing contracts: trial and judgment?
- Mongolia ranks 168th and New Zealand ranks 170th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Trial and judgment (days). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The time for trial and judgment captures the time from the moment defendant is served until the time to appeal has elapsed.