Malaysia vs Tonga: Enforcing contracts: Trial and judgment

Malaysia
270 days
in 2019
Tonga
263 days
in 2019
Malaysia rank
140th
Tonga rank
143rd

Enforcing contracts: Trial and judgment over time

  • Malaysia
  • Tonga
0100200300201120152019

How they compare

Malaysia currently reports 270 days against 263 days in Tonga, a difference of 7 days.

Across all 9 years both countries report, Malaysia has been ahead every year.

Malaysia ranks 140th and Tonga ranks 143rd of 188 countries.

Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: trial and judgment, Malaysia or Tonga?
Malaysia, at 270 days against 263 days in Tonga as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: trial and judgment between Malaysia and Tonga?
7 days, with Malaysia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Tonga?
9 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2019.
How do Malaysia and Tonga rank globally for enforcing contracts: trial and judgment?
Malaysia ranks 140th and Tonga ranks 143rd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Trial and judgment (days). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Trial and judgment (days)
Unit
days
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,702 data points, 2011–2019
Last refreshed

The time for trial and judgment captures the time from the moment defendant is served until the time to appeal has elapsed.