Kyrgyzstan vs Zimbabwe: Enforcing contracts: Trial and judgment
Kyrgyzstan
240 days
in 2019
Zimbabwe
247 days
in 2019
Kyrgyzstan rank
150th
Zimbabwe rank
148th
Enforcing contracts: Trial and judgment over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 247 days against 240 days in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 7 days.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 150th and Zimbabwe ranks 148th of 188 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: trial and judgment, Kyrgyzstan or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 247 days against 240 days in Kyrgyzstan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: trial and judgment between Kyrgyzstan and Zimbabwe?
- 7 days, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Zimbabwe?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2019.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Zimbabwe rank globally for enforcing contracts: trial and judgment?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 150th and Zimbabwe ranks 148th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Trial and judgment (days). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The time for trial and judgment captures the time from the moment defendant is served until the time to appeal has elapsed.