South Korea vs South Sudan: Enforcing contracts: Trial and judgment

South Korea
150 days
in 2019
South Sudan
155 days
in 2019
South Korea rank
174th
South Sudan rank
173rd

Enforcing contracts: Trial and judgment over time

  • South Korea
  • South Sudan
050100150201120152019

How they compare

South Sudan currently reports 155 days against 150 days in South Korea, a difference of 5 days.

Across all 8 years both countries report, South Sudan has been ahead every year.

South Korea ranks 174th and South Sudan ranks 173rd of 188 countries.

South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: trial and judgment, South Korea or South Sudan?
South Sudan, at 155 days against 150 days in South Korea as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: trial and judgment between South Korea and South Sudan?
5 days, with South Sudan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Korea and South Sudan?
8 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2019.
How do South Korea and South Sudan rank globally for enforcing contracts: trial and judgment?
South Korea ranks 174th and South Sudan ranks 173rd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Trial and judgment (days). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Trial and judgment (days)
Unit
days
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,702 data points, 2011–2019
Last refreshed

The time for trial and judgment captures the time from the moment defendant is served until the time to appeal has elapsed.