Kazakhstan vs Mexico: Enforcing contracts: Trial and judgment

Kazakhstan
135 days
in 2019
Mexico
124.15 days
in 2019
Kazakhstan rank
179th
Mexico rank
181st

Enforcing contracts: Trial and judgment over time

  • Kazakhstan
  • Mexico
050100150200201120152019

How they compare

Kazakhstan currently reports 135 days against 124.15 days in Mexico, a difference of 10.85 days.

That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 1.1 times Mexico's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Mexico ahead.

Kazakhstan ranks 179th and Mexico ranks 181st of 188 countries.

Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: trial and judgment, Kazakhstan or Mexico?
Kazakhstan, at 135 days against 124.15 days in Mexico as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: trial and judgment between Kazakhstan and Mexico?
10.85 days, with Kazakhstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Mexico?
9 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2019.
How do Kazakhstan and Mexico rank globally for enforcing contracts: trial and judgment?
Kazakhstan ranks 179th and Mexico ranks 181st of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Trial and judgment (days). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Trial and judgment (days)
Unit
days
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,702 data points, 2011–2019
Last refreshed

The time for trial and judgment captures the time from the moment defendant is served until the time to appeal has elapsed.