Indonesia vs Kazakhstan: Enforcing contracts: Trial and judgment

Indonesia
143.4 days
in 2019
Kazakhstan
135 days
in 2019
Indonesia rank
177th
Kazakhstan rank
179th

Enforcing contracts: Trial and judgment over time

  • Indonesia
  • Kazakhstan
050100150200201120152019

How they compare

Indonesia currently reports 143.4 days against 135 days in Kazakhstan, a difference of 8.4 days.

That makes Indonesia's figure about 1.1 times Kazakhstan's.

Across all 9 years both countries report, Indonesia has been ahead every year.

Indonesia ranks 177th and Kazakhstan ranks 179th of 188 countries.

Indonesia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: trial and judgment, Indonesia or Kazakhstan?
Indonesia, at 143.4 days against 135 days in Kazakhstan as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: trial and judgment between Indonesia and Kazakhstan?
8.4 days, with Indonesia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Kazakhstan?
9 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2019.
How do Indonesia and Kazakhstan rank globally for enforcing contracts: trial and judgment?
Indonesia ranks 177th and Kazakhstan ranks 179th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Trial and judgment (days). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Trial and judgment (days)
Unit
days
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,702 data points, 2011–2019
Last refreshed

The time for trial and judgment captures the time from the moment defendant is served until the time to appeal has elapsed.