Hong Kong vs Sudan: Enforcing contracts: Trial and judgment (days)
Hong Kong
310 days
in 2019
Sudan
310 days
in 2019
Hong Kong rank
122nd
Sudan rank
122nd
Enforcing contracts: Trial and judgment (days) over time
- Hong Kong
- Sudan
How they compare
Hong Kong currently reports 310 days against 310 days in Sudan, a difference of 0 days.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Sudan has been ahead every year.
Hong Kong ranks 122nd and Sudan ranks 122nd of 191 countries.
Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: trial and judgment, Hong Kong or Sudan?
- Hong Kong, at 310 days against 310 days in Sudan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: trial and judgment between Hong Kong and Sudan?
- 0 days, with Hong Kong ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Sudan?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2019.
- How do Hong Kong and Sudan rank globally for enforcing contracts: trial and judgment?
- Hong Kong ranks 122nd and Sudan ranks 122nd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Trial and judgment (days). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The time for trial and judgment captures the time from the moment defendant is served until the time to appeal has elapsed.