Hong Kong vs Latvia: Enforcing contracts: Trial and judgment
Hong Kong
310 days
in 2019
Latvia
300 days
in 2019
Hong Kong rank
121st
Latvia rank
124th
Enforcing contracts: Trial and judgment over time
- Hong Kong
- Latvia
How they compare
Hong Kong currently reports 310 days against 300 days in Latvia, a difference of 10 days.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Hong Kong has been ahead every year.
Hong Kong ranks 121st and Latvia ranks 124th of 188 countries.
Hong Kong has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: trial and judgment, Hong Kong or Latvia?
- Hong Kong, at 310 days against 300 days in Latvia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: trial and judgment between Hong Kong and Latvia?
- 10 days, with Hong Kong ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Latvia?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2019.
- How do Hong Kong and Latvia rank globally for enforcing contracts: trial and judgment?
- Hong Kong ranks 121st and Latvia ranks 124th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Trial and judgment (days). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The time for trial and judgment captures the time from the moment defendant is served until the time to appeal has elapsed.