Finland vs Malta: Enforcing contracts: Trial and judgment

Finland
365 days
in 2019
Malta
365 days
in 2019
Finland rank
87th
Malta rank
87th

Enforcing contracts: Trial and judgment over time

  • Finland
  • Malta
0100200300400201120152019

How they compare

Finland currently reports 365 days against 365 days in Malta, a difference of 0 days.

Across all 9 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.

Finland ranks 87th and Malta ranks 87th of 188 countries.

Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: trial and judgment, Finland or Malta?
Finland, at 365 days against 365 days in Malta as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: trial and judgment between Finland and Malta?
0 days, with Finland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Malta?
9 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2019.
How do Finland and Malta rank globally for enforcing contracts: trial and judgment?
Finland ranks 87th and Malta ranks 87th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Trial and judgment (days). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Trial and judgment (days)
Unit
days
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,702 data points, 2011–2019
Last refreshed

The time for trial and judgment captures the time from the moment defendant is served until the time to appeal has elapsed.