Ecuador vs Montenegro: Enforcing contracts: Trial and judgment

Ecuador
365 days
in 2019
Montenegro
365 days
in 2019
Ecuador rank
87th
Montenegro rank
87th

Enforcing contracts: Trial and judgment over time

  • Ecuador
  • Montenegro
0100200300400500201120152019

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 365 days against 365 days in Montenegro, a difference of 0 days.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 87th and Montenegro ranks 87th of 188 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: trial and judgment, Ecuador or Montenegro?
Ecuador, at 365 days against 365 days in Montenegro as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: trial and judgment between Ecuador and Montenegro?
0 days, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Montenegro?
9 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2019.
How do Ecuador and Montenegro rank globally for enforcing contracts: trial and judgment?
Ecuador ranks 87th and Montenegro ranks 87th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Trial and judgment (days). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Trial and judgment (days)
Unit
days
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,702 data points, 2011–2019
Last refreshed

The time for trial and judgment captures the time from the moment defendant is served until the time to appeal has elapsed.