China vs Peru: Enforcing contracts: Trial and judgment
China
223.5 days
in 2019
Peru
223 days
in 2019
China rank
159th
Peru rank
160th
Enforcing contracts: Trial and judgment over time
- China
- Peru
How they compare
China currently reports 223.5 days against 223 days in Peru, a difference of 0.5 days.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2011 it was China ahead.
China ranks 159th and Peru ranks 160th of 191 countries.
China has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: trial and judgment, China or Peru?
- China, at 223.5 days against 223 days in Peru as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: trial and judgment between China and Peru?
- 0.5 days, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Peru?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2019.
- How do China and Peru rank globally for enforcing contracts: trial and judgment?
- China ranks 159th and Peru ranks 160th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Trial and judgment (days). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The time for trial and judgment captures the time from the moment defendant is served until the time to appeal has elapsed.