China vs Marshall Islands: Enforcing contracts: Trial and judgment (days)
China
223.5 days
in 2019
Marshall Islands
200 days
in 2019
China rank
159th
Marshall Islands rank
162nd
Enforcing contracts: Trial and judgment (days) over time
- China
- Marshall Islands
How they compare
China currently reports 223.5 days against 200 days in Marshall Islands, a difference of 23.5 days.
That makes China's figure about 1.1 times Marshall Islands's.
Across all 9 years both countries report, China has been ahead every year.
China ranks 159th and Marshall Islands ranks 162nd of 191 countries.
China has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: trial and judgment, China or Marshall Islands?
- China, at 223.5 days against 200 days in Marshall Islands as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: trial and judgment between China and Marshall Islands?
- 23.5 days, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Marshall Islands?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2019.
- How do China and Marshall Islands rank globally for enforcing contracts: trial and judgment?
- China ranks 159th and Marshall Islands ranks 162nd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Trial and judgment (days). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The time for trial and judgment captures the time from the moment defendant is served until the time to appeal has elapsed.