China vs Fiji: Enforcing contracts: Trial and judgment

China
223.5 days
in 2019
Fiji
206 days
in 2019
China rank
158th
Fiji rank
160th

Enforcing contracts: Trial and judgment over time

  • China
  • Fiji
050100150200201120152019

How they compare

China currently reports 223.5 days against 206 days in Fiji, a difference of 17.5 days.

That makes China's figure about 1.1 times Fiji's.

Across all 9 years both countries report, China has been ahead every year.

China ranks 158th and Fiji ranks 160th of 188 countries.

China has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: trial and judgment, China or Fiji?
China, at 223.5 days against 206 days in Fiji as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: trial and judgment between China and Fiji?
17.5 days, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Fiji?
9 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2019.
How do China and Fiji rank globally for enforcing contracts: trial and judgment?
China ranks 158th and Fiji ranks 160th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Trial and judgment (days). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Trial and judgment (days)
Unit
days
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,702 data points, 2011–2019
Last refreshed

The time for trial and judgment captures the time from the moment defendant is served until the time to appeal has elapsed.