Chile vs Malaysia: Enforcing contracts: Trial and judgment
Chile
270 days
in 2019
Malaysia
270 days
in 2019
Chile rank
141st
Malaysia rank
141st
Enforcing contracts: Trial and judgment over time
- Chile
- Malaysia
How they compare
Chile currently reports 270 days against 270 days in Malaysia, a difference of 0 days.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Malaysia has been ahead every year.
Chile ranks 141st and Malaysia ranks 141st of 191 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: trial and judgment, Chile or Malaysia?
- Chile, at 270 days against 270 days in Malaysia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: trial and judgment between Chile and Malaysia?
- 0 days, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Malaysia?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2019.
- How do Chile and Malaysia rank globally for enforcing contracts: trial and judgment?
- Chile ranks 141st and Malaysia ranks 141st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Trial and judgment (days). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The time for trial and judgment captures the time from the moment defendant is served until the time to appeal has elapsed.