Chile vs Eritrea: Enforcing contracts: Trial and judgment

Chile
270 days
in 2019
Eritrea
270 days
in 2019
Chile rank
140th
Eritrea rank
140th

Enforcing contracts: Trial and judgment over time

  • Chile
  • Eritrea
0100200300201120152019

How they compare

Chile currently reports 270 days against 270 days in Eritrea, a difference of 0 days.

Across all 9 years both countries report, Eritrea has been ahead every year.

Chile ranks 140th and Eritrea ranks 140th of 188 countries.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: trial and judgment, Chile or Eritrea?
Chile, at 270 days against 270 days in Eritrea as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: trial and judgment between Chile and Eritrea?
0 days, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Eritrea?
9 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2019.
How do Chile and Eritrea rank globally for enforcing contracts: trial and judgment?
Chile ranks 140th and Eritrea ranks 140th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Trial and judgment (days). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Trial and judgment (days)
Unit
days
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,702 data points, 2011–2019
Last refreshed

The time for trial and judgment captures the time from the moment defendant is served until the time to appeal has elapsed.