Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Papua New Guinea: Enforcing contracts: Trial and judgment
Bosnia and Herzegovina
385 days
in 2019
Papua New Guinea
381 days
in 2019
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
83rd
Papua New Guinea rank
84th
Enforcing contracts: Trial and judgment over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 385 days against 381 days in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 4 days.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Bosnia and Herzegovina has been ahead every year.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 83rd and Papua New Guinea ranks 84th of 191 countries.
Bosnia and Herzegovina has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: trial and judgment, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Papua New Guinea?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 385 days against 381 days in Papua New Guinea as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: trial and judgment between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Papua New Guinea?
- 4 days, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Papua New Guinea?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2019.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Papua New Guinea rank globally for enforcing contracts: trial and judgment?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 83rd and Papua New Guinea ranks 84th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Trial and judgment (days). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The time for trial and judgment captures the time from the moment defendant is served until the time to appeal has elapsed.