Australia vs Mauritius: Enforcing contracts: Trial and judgment
Australia
328 days
in 2019
Mauritius
325 days
in 2019
Australia rank
114th
Mauritius rank
115th
Enforcing contracts: Trial and judgment over time
- Australia
- Mauritius
How they compare
Australia currently reports 328 days against 325 days in Mauritius, a difference of 3 days.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Mauritius ahead.
Australia ranks 114th and Mauritius ranks 115th of 188 countries.
Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: trial and judgment, Australia or Mauritius?
- Australia, at 328 days against 325 days in Mauritius as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: trial and judgment between Australia and Mauritius?
- 3 days, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Mauritius?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2019.
- How do Australia and Mauritius rank globally for enforcing contracts: trial and judgment?
- Australia ranks 114th and Mauritius ranks 115th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Trial and judgment (days). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The time for trial and judgment captures the time from the moment defendant is served until the time to appeal has elapsed.