Australia vs Laos: Enforcing contracts: Trial and judgment
Australia
328 days
in 2019
Laos
344 days
in 2019
Australia rank
114th
Laos rank
112th
Enforcing contracts: Trial and judgment over time
- Australia
- Laos
How they compare
Laos currently reports 344 days against 328 days in Australia, a difference of 16 days.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Laos has been ahead every year.
Australia ranks 114th and Laos ranks 112th of 188 countries.
Laos has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: trial and judgment, Australia or Laos?
- Laos, at 344 days against 328 days in Australia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: trial and judgment between Australia and Laos?
- 16 days, with Laos ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Laos?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2019.
- How do Australia and Laos rank globally for enforcing contracts: trial and judgment?
- Australia ranks 114th and Laos ranks 112th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Trial and judgment (days). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The time for trial and judgment captures the time from the moment defendant is served until the time to appeal has elapsed.