Australia vs Estonia: Enforcing contracts: Trial and judgment
Australia
328 days
in 2019
Estonia
320 days
in 2019
Australia rank
114th
Estonia rank
117th
Enforcing contracts: Trial and judgment over time
- Australia
- Estonia
How they compare
Australia currently reports 328 days against 320 days in Estonia, a difference of 8 days.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Australia has been ahead every year.
Australia ranks 114th and Estonia ranks 117th of 188 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: trial and judgment, Australia or Estonia?
- Australia, at 328 days against 320 days in Estonia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: trial and judgment between Australia and Estonia?
- 8 days, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Estonia?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2019.
- How do Australia and Estonia rank globally for enforcing contracts: trial and judgment?
- Australia ranks 114th and Estonia ranks 117th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Trial and judgment (days). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The time for trial and judgment captures the time from the moment defendant is served until the time to appeal has elapsed.