Thailand vs Zimbabwe: Enforcing contracts: Time
Thailand
420 days
in 2019
Zimbabwe
410 days
in 2019
Thailand rank
156th
Zimbabwe rank
158th
Enforcing contracts: Time over time
- Thailand
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Thailand currently reports 420 days against 410 days in Zimbabwe, a difference of 10 days.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Thailand has been ahead every year.
Thailand ranks 156th and Zimbabwe ranks 158th of 191 countries.
Thailand has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Thailand | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 479 days | 410 days | 69 days | Thailand |
| 2010s | 441.8 days | 410 days | 31.8 days | Thailand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: time, Thailand or Zimbabwe?
- Thailand, at 420 days against 410 days in Zimbabwe as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: time between Thailand and Zimbabwe?
- 10 days, with Thailand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Thailand and Zimbabwe?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Thailand and Zimbabwe rank globally for enforcing contracts: time?
- Thailand ranks 156th and Zimbabwe ranks 158th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Time (days). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The time to enforce contracts is recorded in calendar days, counted from the moment plaintiff decides to file the lawsuit in court until payment. The average duration of the following three different stages of dispute resolution is recorded: (i) filing and service, (ii) trial and judgment, and (iii) enforcement.