New Zealand vs South Sudan: Enforcing contracts: Time
New Zealand
216 days
in 2019
South Sudan
228 days
in 2019
New Zealand rank
187th
South Sudan rank
184th
Enforcing contracts: Time over time
- New Zealand
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 228 days against 216 days in New Zealand, a difference of 12 days.
That makes South Sudan's figure about 1.1 times New Zealand's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, South Sudan has been ahead every year.
New Zealand ranks 187th and South Sudan ranks 184th of 188 countries.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: time, New Zealand or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 228 days against 216 days in New Zealand as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: time between New Zealand and South Sudan?
- 12 days, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and South Sudan?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2019.
- How do New Zealand and South Sudan rank globally for enforcing contracts: time?
- New Zealand ranks 187th and South Sudan ranks 184th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Time (days). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The time to enforce contracts is recorded in calendar days, counted from the moment plaintiff decides to file the lawsuit in court until payment. The average duration of the following three different stages of dispute resolution is recorded: (i) filing and service, (ii) trial and judgment, and (iii) enforcement.