New Zealand vs Singapore: Enforcing contracts: Time
New Zealand
216 days
in 2019
Singapore
164 days
in 2019
New Zealand rank
187th
Singapore rank
188th
Enforcing contracts: Time over time
- New Zealand
- Singapore
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 216 days against 164 days in Singapore, a difference of 52 days.
That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.3 times Singapore's.
Across all 17 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.
New Zealand ranks 187th and Singapore ranks 188th of 188 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 216 days | 128.57 days | 87.43 days | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 216 days | 161.2 days | 54.8 days | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: time, New Zealand or Singapore?
- New Zealand, at 216 days against 164 days in Singapore as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: time between New Zealand and Singapore?
- 52 days, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Singapore?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do New Zealand and Singapore rank globally for enforcing contracts: time?
- New Zealand ranks 187th and Singapore ranks 188th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Time (days). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The time to enforce contracts is recorded in calendar days, counted from the moment plaintiff decides to file the lawsuit in court until payment. The average duration of the following three different stages of dispute resolution is recorded: (i) filing and service, (ii) trial and judgment, and (iii) enforcement.