Myanmar vs East Timor: Enforcing contracts: Time

Myanmar
1,160 days
in 2019
East Timor
1,285 days
in 2019
Myanmar rank
16th
East Timor rank
14th

Enforcing contracts: Time over time

  • Myanmar
  • East Timor
05001.0k1.5k2.0k200420112019

How they compare

East Timor currently reports 1,285 days against 1,160 days in Myanmar, a difference of 125 days.

That makes East Timor's figure about 1.1 times Myanmar's.

Across all 8 years both countries report, East Timor has been ahead every year.

Myanmar ranks 16th and East Timor ranks 14th of 188 countries.

East Timor has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: time, Myanmar or East Timor?
East Timor, at 1,285 days against 1,160 days in Myanmar as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: time between Myanmar and East Timor?
125 days, with East Timor ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Myanmar and East Timor?
8 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2019.
How do Myanmar and East Timor rank globally for enforcing contracts: time?
Myanmar ranks 16th and East Timor ranks 14th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Time (days). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Time (days)
Unit
days
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 3,083 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The time to enforce contracts is recorded in calendar days, counted from the moment plaintiff decides to file the lawsuit in court until payment. The average duration of the following three different stages of dispute resolution is recorded: (i) filing and service, (ii) trial and judgment, and (iii) enforcement.