Malaysia vs United Kingdom: Enforcing contracts: Time
Malaysia
425 days
in 2019
United Kingdom
437 days
in 2019
Malaysia rank
153rd
United Kingdom rank
150th
Enforcing contracts: Time over time
- Malaysia
- United Kingdom
How they compare
United Kingdom currently reports 437 days against 425 days in Malaysia, a difference of 12 days.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Malaysia ahead.
Malaysia ranks 153rd and United Kingdom ranks 150th of 188 countries.
Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | United Kingdom | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 597.86 days | 403.29 days | 194.57 days | Malaysia |
| 2010s | 441 days | 429.4 days | 11.6 days | Malaysia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: time, Malaysia or United Kingdom?
- United Kingdom, at 437 days against 425 days in Malaysia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: time between Malaysia and United Kingdom?
- 12 days, with United Kingdom ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and United Kingdom?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Malaysia and United Kingdom rank globally for enforcing contracts: time?
- Malaysia ranks 153rd and United Kingdom ranks 150th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Time (days). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The time to enforce contracts is recorded in calendar days, counted from the moment plaintiff decides to file the lawsuit in court until payment. The average duration of the following three different stages of dispute resolution is recorded: (i) filing and service, (ii) trial and judgment, and (iii) enforcement.