Malaysia vs Thailand: Enforcing contracts: Time
Malaysia
425 days
in 2019
Thailand
420 days
in 2019
Malaysia rank
153rd
Thailand rank
155th
Enforcing contracts: Time over time
- Malaysia
- Thailand
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 425 days against 420 days in Thailand, a difference of 5 days.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Malaysia ahead.
Malaysia ranks 153rd and Thailand ranks 155th of 188 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Malaysia averaged higher in 1 and Thailand in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | Thailand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 597.86 days | 479 days | 118.86 days | Malaysia |
| 2010s | 441 days | 441.8 days | 0.8 days | Thailand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: time, Malaysia or Thailand?
- Malaysia, at 425 days against 420 days in Thailand as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: time between Malaysia and Thailand?
- 5 days, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Thailand?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Malaysia and Thailand rank globally for enforcing contracts: time?
- Malaysia ranks 153rd and Thailand ranks 155th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Time (days). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The time to enforce contracts is recorded in calendar days, counted from the moment plaintiff decides to file the lawsuit in court until payment. The average duration of the following three different stages of dispute resolution is recorded: (i) filing and service, (ii) trial and judgment, and (iii) enforcement.